In my first
blog post I asked myself this question: Why
is the relationship between apples and women problematic within art, literature
and poetry? We are going to attempt to answer this question, using what we have
learnt from my previous posts. The beginning image of the apple and its
association with the Garden of Eden becomes "the guiding myth of Western
culture"(Tamar and Moran, 1). This image carries such strong negative
connotations, that it manages to resonate itself through the Snow
White story, with the same implications. The apple seems to stand for sex
and the loss of innocence, which becomes a problematic aspect when women are
involved. This is because women are 'supposed' to embody qualities of
denial and self-control, yet these principles are unfair because they
have been constructed by a patriarchal and oppressive society.
On the Victorian Website, under the subheading Hunger as an Instrument of
Self-Control and Self-Denial, I found this useful quote:
If we read the
apple as a way of revealing the anxieties associated with a certain discourse,
we can certainly say that the discourse in query is one that revolves around
femininity (representations of female gender roles) and sexuality (the profound
fear of female sexuality and the potential consequences of indulging
in desires). In the case of Eve and Snow White, the apple motif manages
to materialise this fear through their eating of the fruit. They are punished
for their appetites. For example, Eve’s punishment for “eating Death” (9.792)
means that she can never return “to a state of pre-lapsarian innocence” (Ward,
38). While, Snow White’s consumption “serves as a vehicle for a more
potentially disturbing issue — in this case, sexual maturation from girl to
woman”(Victorianweb). This is shown in the ending of the story, where Snow
white will marry and assume her role as a respectable woman. I believe the
relationship between food and women in general is difficult and impossible to
sustain, because the “desire for food is often confused, in
particular, for sexual desire” (24). Looking at food alongside
sexuality restricts and oppresses a woman, who can only be seen as good for not
eating, and bad for not eating. In other words, haunted by the dynamic of the
'fallen woman' and the 'angel in the house'.It is interesting to note in art,
the representation of apples and women are also indicative of sexuality/sin,
while the depiction of apples and men are indicative of positive things… Take a
look at these paintings and let me know what you think!
References
Victorianweb.org,. 'Food And Famine In
Victorian Literature'. N.p., 2009. Web. 23 Mar. 2015.
Ward, Mary. The Literature Of Love.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Print.
Wilkins, John. Food In European
Literature. Exeter, UK: Intellect Books, 1996. Print.
Heller, Tamar, and Patricia Moran. Scenes Of The Apple. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003. Print.
Heller, Tamar, and Patricia Moran. Scenes Of The Apple. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003. Print.
My favourite so far! I really enjoyed this Amy. I really love the images at the end which show a really big contrast between the female's relationship with apples, to the male relationship. For instance, I understood that women were represented differently but these images really show you how negative the assumptions are, with naked women, and smartly, fully clothed men holding apples. Very interesting! I look forward to reading your next post!
ReplyDeleteVery interesting and well explored topic, Amra! A fascinating read, waiting for more!
ReplyDelete